Bret Wood's Efforts and Exploits

An updated guide to film and DVD work.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

FAUST rises again

Apologies for my bloglessness, but I've been making up for lost time on several Kino projects.

Just to show that I and my blog are still alive, I'm posting links to reviews of the new edition of F.W. Murnau's FAUST that I produced, which was released along with a box set of Murnau silents.



Next time I blog, I promise... insights, wit, etc. But for now.... shameless self-promotion.


DVD TOWN.COM

AUSTIN CHRONICLE

THE NEW YORK TIMES

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY

THE NEW YORKER

DVD TALK

THE AUTEURS

HUFFINGTON POST

BOX OFFICE.COM

PARALLAX VIEW

THE DAILY PAGE

SEAN AXMAKER.COM



If you're into German silents at all, you owe it to yourself to check out the new FAUST, because the image quality is a huge improvement over what was previously released. And if you get the double-disc set, there is a phenomenal documentary on the making of the film that does multi-screen comparisons of the various takes from the film. Through this, one can track Murnau's creative process, see him experiment and change his mind, and gain profound understanding of the freedom he was allowed while making this film at Ufa. There's honestly nothing else of its kind out there. I can't recommend it highly enough.

Maybe I already posted it, but here's the trailer I cut for the release:

CLICK HERE FOR TRAILER

Sunday, February 22, 2009

IN MEMORIAM

R.I.P. Kelly Groucutt

Friday, February 06, 2009

Bret Gets Kinky



As briefly alluded to in a recent Facebook status report, my short film The Other Half will have its world premiere on Wednesday, February 25 in New York. The screening is at 9:00 pm at the Anthology Film Archives, as part of the CineKink Film Festival.

I'm proud to say, at this point, the film has a 100% festival acceptance rate! I'd better savor that feeling while I can.

If you're a New Yorker, you can purchase tickets (and peruse CineKink's other offerings) at the Official CineKink B-Side Website.

I was referred to them by Ray Privett, the brain behind the distribution collective Cinema Purgatorio. He pinpointed it as a cool, well-run festival with a loyal following, and a demographic that is... shall we say... not unsuited to my brand of filmmaking.

The festival is in its sixth year and, according to its mission statement: "Founded in 2003, CineKink is an organization that recognizes and encourages the positive depiction of sexuality and kink in film and television, most visibly through its annual film festival, CineKink NYC. Featuring a specially-selected program of films and videos that celebrate and explore a wide diversity of sexuality, with offerings drawn from both Hollywood and beyond, works presented by CineKink range from documentary to drama, camp comedy to hot porn, mildly spicy to quite explicit - and everything in between."

I only hope their audience doesn't find it too tame for their tastes.

I'm eager to check out CineKink -- still debating whether or not I'm going. Ordinarily I'd gladly put up the $150 -- but right now, every spare dollar goes in the filmmaking pot. If I'm really going to shoot a feature this summer, I gotta tighten the belt and make sacrifices.

I know... some cast and crew members might now be thinking, "I thought you told me this was NOT porn!" No, it's not porn, but you knew it wasn't the typical quirky Southern indie film the moment you pulled into that fleabag motel in Rome.

I've posted photos online, but realize I haven't shared the plotline, so here's the official story: "To evade the psychological cruelty of her disabled husband, a woman arranges a sexual tryst for him and a 'dancer' at a cheap motel."

EMBRACE THE ABJECT! Let's face it -- I don't make the same movies as everyone else -- and my work belongs in a festival that caters to, uh, unconventional tastes. I'm hoping that at CineKink, The Other Half will find an audience that appreciates its eclecticism.

The Other Half will be playing along with a feature film, MindFLESH.

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Second Best Place to Live

Much has been happening lately -- and I am way overdue in my bloggery -- so give me a few posts in which to catch up. In the near future, I plan to talk about

1) The World premiere of my short film THE OTHER HALF (2/25)
2) My plans to shoot a feature film this summer: THE LITTLE DEATH.

Later.

The point of today's post is just to call attention to an article in the Winter 2009 issue of MovieMaker Magazine: "Best Places to Live in 2009: The 25 best cities in the U.S. to ride it out as an independent moviemaker this year."

Surprisingly, they chose Atlanta as #2 on the list.

It's not online yet, but I'm sure the good folks over at MM won't mind me plugging the article with a sample, since I'm quoted therein:



No offense to my L.A. friends -- I just thought a little snarkiness would help get me in print -- and whaddya know -- it worked! My quote is a little more coherent in its entirety, but I have no complaint about how it appears in the magazine. Here's the whole enchilada, for posterity:

Atlanta is full of artists eager to climb the filmmaking ladder but -- because it's Atlanta, where there's very little studio/network production and virtually no investors -- there are few rungs to grab hold of. As a result, the indie film scene is more like a human pyramid, where aspiring writers/directors/actors pool their talents and trade favors in order to make the kind of films that gets festival play and stand a shot at distribution. It's not unusual to see accomplished directors working as d.p.'s, actors dishing crafties, and producers painting sets.

If you're too proud to hold a boom... move to L.A.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Worth the SACRIFICE

When people ask me what I do for a living, I explain that I am a DVD producer. "What does that mean?" they ask. I go into a brief explanation of how films are prepared for DVD, from mastering the film to curating special features to designing the menus and packaging. Their eyes glaze over, and then they inevitably ask, "Yeah, but what do you do?"



At Atlanta's Plaza Theatre, on Tuesday 1/20/09, there will be a screening of Andrei Tarkovsky's The Sacrifice (1986), and it provides a good opportunity for me to elaborate a little on what it is I actually do. For those of you who don't really know me, or care about my day job, it might still interest you, because it raises certain issues of artistic ethics and how video technology can alter the way film is preserved.

In late 2008, Kino International put me in charge of producing a high-definition version of The Sacrifice. The Svensk Filminstitutet (Swedish Film Institute), which originally produced the film, provided us with an archival 35mm low-contrast print. Low-con prints are used when the negative is too precious or fragile to ship. It is low-contrast so that a superior image can be obtained during film transfer (you can master from a 35mm projection print, but generally the "blacks are crushed" -- that is, so dark that detail is lost).

So, Kino gets the print and I supervise the telecine transfer, in HD, with colorist D.C. Cardinalli of Crawford Communications. The print looks good but I realize that, when we compare the low-con 35mm print to the existing video master, there are significant differences between the two. The color in the print are subdued. A considerable part of the film is almost colorless, with a sepia overtone (just the slightest hints of color peek through). On the existing video master (from which were derived not only Kino's DVD but the DVD of a number of companies around the world), an effort appears to have been made to restore as much color as possible to these scenes (and lessen the sepia tint). Some scenes have no sepia tint, but are pure black-and-white. Even in the more naturalistic scenes, the sky is blue and the grass is green, while on the low-con print there is a more subtle range of colors.

It was possible for us to make the HD video master match the existing video master, in all its colorful glory. But should it?

After some correspondence with the Svensk Filminstitutet, I find an essay by d.p. Sven Nykvist, where he writes, "I remember, among other things, how well we worked together when we after the shooting was completed performed the, to the movie so significant, color reduction in the laboratory."

In a telecine suite, it is easy to radically alter the look of a film, and it is the job of the producer to work with the colorist to find the chromatic balance that suits the film and is accurate to the filmmakers' intentions. But -- in the case of The Sacrifice, where the director died in 1986 and the director of photography died in 2006 -- how do we know what their intentions were?



Fortunately, Kino has an original 35mm exhibition print from 1986. This means it was printed according to Tarkovsky's and Nykvist's lab specifications. Note: these printing instructions are kept with the negative for future lab printings; however, the settings do not translate to telecine coloration, so these printing instructions are useless to the video colorist, who has to start from scratch. So the projection print provides the key to the proper look of the film. And part of seeing the proper look is seeing it projected on the screen.

Enter Jonny Rej and the Plaza Theatre. No really, enter it. Tuesday. Because that's when we'll be screening The Sacrifice and seeing how it was intended to be seen (assuming the labwork in 1986 was pretty good and the colors haven't started "turning"). Afterwards, I will return to Crawford and make final adjustments to the picture before the film takes its next step toward BluRay authoring and preparation for digital download.

One reason I felt it worth explaining all this is that the new version I create is going to be much different than the Sacrifice people have come to recognize as Tarkovsky's film. I suspect there will be some who accuse me of tampering with Tarkovsky's film. Most likely, these will be people who never saw it in a theatre -- only on video. I just want the record to show that, on the contrary, I am restoring the film to its original look by removing a lot of the conventionlized color that it has always had on video -- and show that every effort has been made to verify the proper appearance of each scene of the film.

Not every DVD I produce entails this much research, or warrants this much explanation, but it isn't often that I have a chance to change the way we see a film made by one of cinema's great visual stylists. If I'm going to leave my mark on a film like that -- I want to make darn sure it's the right kind of mark.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

And I do mean X-Mas

I recently read a lame article in Moviemaker Magazine of someone's "10 Best Anti-Christmas Movies," and was shocked at how shallow and lame they were.... Scrooged, National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation, The Nightmare Before Christmas. Come on, man, are you kidding? The earliest one was 1972, which is pretty typical of film scholarship in this day and age.

So I thought I'd wrap up the holiday season by posting some of my favorite grim cinematic takes on Christmas, and inviting you to respond with same.

The absolute best:

John Waters' Female Trouble. Watch what happens when Divine doesn't get the Cha Cha Heels she wanted.

Erich von Stroheim had a particular distaste for Christmas, as in Greed, when McTeague murders Trina in a kindergarten, surrounded by Christmas decorations (and the cops hang out across the street). Watch it here (unfortunately, the clip starts midway through the scene). EvS struck again in 1932, in one of my personal favorites, Walking Down Broadway (aka Hello Sister), in which a tragic scene is played out beneath Christmas decorations.

Tod Browning knew how to push the irony button. In his 1925 film The Unholy Three, a gang of dime museum criminals (the midget and the strong man) break into a house on Christmas Eve to rob the safe. A small child wakes up and comes downstairs. Seeing the strongman, then the midget, the child says, "Oh, Santa! You brought me a baby bruvver!" At which point the midget (Harry Earles as Tweedledee) strangles the child. When the child's father comes in to stop it, they kill him. Of course, the censors required that the scene be cut from the film, but pictures survive to show that it really happened.

In Browning's The Devil Doll, a criminal (Lionel Barrymore) shrinks people and uses telepathy to command them to carry out revenge on his enemies. One of the "dolls" is hung on a Christmas tree as an ornament and, in the middle of the night, climbs down off the tree to perform his duty as the clock strikes twelve. Unfortunately, the "doll" is discovered at the last second and gets stomped. The trailer is here, but it doesn't include that scene.

And who can forget William Powell taking pot shots at Christmas ornaments with a BB gun in The Thin Man?

Don't get me wrong, I like Christmas. But around this time of year, we need a dash of cold water in the face to wake us up and give us the energy to take down the decorations.

Just stop all this hooey about National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Fourth Ain't Bad

Pretty cool end-of-the-year news... the DVD I produced of F.W. Murnau's The Last Laugh was given the #4 spot on Entertainment Weekly's Ten Best DVDs of 2008. This just after Sight and Sound included Houdini in their best of 2008 list. Not a bad Christmas present.

CHECK OUT THE ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY STORY

Thanks to everyone who worked on that disc. For any Murnau fans out there, Kino will shortly release a super-deluxe DVD of Faust with an incredible documentary about the making of the film, and a beautiful new restoration. We're also releasing two Murnau films previously unavailable: The Haunted Castle and Finances of the Grand Duke, both from 35mm restorations by the F.W. Murnau Stiftung.

Happy Holidays everyone, stay in touch.

-----------

Then, as soon as I posted this, I realize that Tim Lucas, editor of Video Watchdog, put Houdini on his Five Best DVDs of 2008 list.

READ ALL ABOUT IT.

-----------

End-of-year update: The New York Times just put my GRIFFITH MASTERWORKS collection on their list of 10 Best DVDs of 2008

In terms of critical appreciation 2008 turned out to be a great year.